The availability of medically accurate sex education is an investment in our children’s future as well as their well-being.
But the way that I see it, the reason teaching comprehensive sex education and being able to “provide [students] with developmentally appropriate knowledge and skills, a medically accurate sex education” is the most economically soundplan is because of positive externalities.
Sex education has long been the debate on how much, how little, cost, and value discussions when it comes to government regulations. The truth is that the government has to have some say in what gets taught in schools, and a quality standard in order to protect people.
However, after going through economics, I have had my brain rewired to think in externalities and effects on others as well as my future. Comprehensive sex education is a positive externalities, it will positively affect those around even if they did not pay for it. Students who are exposed to scientifically correct information are able and more likely to share it.A student who has been taught that condoms are the best way to prevent pregnancy and STIs is more likely to require one, as well as make sure friends require on too. This spread of healthy information, correct tactics and actions, as well as knowledge of how a body actually work is something every child needs to know to live a happy life.
I enjoyed that you used your knowledge of externalities to prove the government's need to have a role in sex education. Along with that idea, you should talk about how sex education could have prevented AIDs to spread as much as it did or how it could help in case of a similar epidemic or something like that. Also, do you have something to say to people who believe sex ed is a part of learning religion and people who don't want the government to interfere for that reason?
ReplyDeleteGreat picture. I really think it sums up everything that you were trying to say in this article.
ReplyDelete